O'Reilly and Associates, not only includes PNG chapters in a number of its Everybody's favorite technical publisher, You're in need of something, and please let me know if I've missed any!)īut that's just one data point. (By the way, I maintain theĪpplications of various persuasions on half a dozen pages stop by if That's a moderately subtle point-itĭoesn't necessarily leap right out at you and scream, PNG hasĭammit!, but it's nevertheless quite a significant milestone for any new Or editor that ships without PNG support is considered deficientīy both consumers and the trade press. It has advanced from being a newsworthy ``extra'' to beingĪn expected, standard component of image applications in other words, a viewer
PNG has been making steady progress, however, particularly in non-WebĪpplications. Transparency and gamma correction, but that's coming let me return to that One really supports PNG well yet, at least with respect to alpha As various Slashdotters have noted, neither Internet Explorer pretty much define what counts as acceptable Web technology,Īnd they only began supporting PNG natively in the autumn of 1997 (versionsĤ.04 and 4.0, respectively). For better or for worse, Netscape Navigator and Microsoft The Widely Webbed World completely by storm (which, in the eyes of the
#Props from section 80 album cover png update#
Image format, so here's an update from somebody who knows a tiny bit about it.įirst of all, PNG is certainly not dead, although it obviously has not taken
Of FUD and some general cluelessness about the I hadn't intended to write anything up so soon, but lately there's been a lot What Greg has to say on the subject of PNG: Personally, I just want a realĪlpha channel on web pages (well, and anti-aliased fonts,īut lets cross one bridge at a time), Anyway, read Format has many technical advantages, yet it still isn't
0 kommentar(er)
